[ Please observe Mail-Followup-To: if you don't mind, I susbcribe to *and* read debian-x, I don't need another copy on my inbox ]
>> "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Basically the DRM modules in 4.1.0 are not in sync with 2.4.7. I > > THis is correct. 4.1.0 DRM and 4.0.3 are not compatible, and I didn't mean that. What I meant is that, according to the messages I attached, the DRM sources in the 2.4.7 *kernel* tree are not the same as those in the 4.1.0 *X server* tree. Since the X server (more precisely, the DRI modules) expect a specific version of the DRM interface, compiling the DRM support from the kernel insn't enough to get a working DRI setup (déjà vu) But Mike is right, the old modules are also useless, too. I wish we had a way to express this via dependencies, but I don't see a simple way of doing that given the variables involved. -- Marcelo | "Oook?" [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
