On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: > Charl P. Botha wrote: > > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the > > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to > > Thomas Dickey. > > I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't > it (or anonther solution) be integrated in the package?
It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes for binding escape to meta. > works with mutt, slrn, ... , however. Although I know the question has > been asked several times, and the answer has probably already been > given, I couldn't find it... What's the "right" way to deal with that? I have no idea. I'm a ctrl-a ctrl-e kind of guy. :) -- charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/