Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:01:50 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: reopen 274373 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2004 12:48:02 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 01 05:48:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adsl-81-7-122-124.takas.lt (dubrava.localdomain.fake) [81.7.122.124] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CDMpN-0005v9-00; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:48:01 -0700 Received: by dubrava.localdomain.fake (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2938E110EB26; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:46:26 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-13?q?Mantas_Kriau=E8i=FBnas?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xlibs should have versioned dependancy to libraries packages X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:46:26 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xlibs Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Severity: normal Hi, I think xlibs should have versioned dependancy to individual library packages, because in current situation command "apt-get install xlibs" doesn't upgrade real x libraries - it only upgrades an xlibs metapackage and leaves outdated real x libraries (for example libx11-6, libxext6 and libxft1), so this misleads lots of users. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dubrava.homelinux.org 2.6.5-1-k7 #2 Fri Apr 30 20:46:35 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=lt_LT, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT Versions of packages xlibs depends on: ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Input extension li ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxmuu1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 lightweight X Window System miscel ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System printing extension ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X pixmap library ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii libxtrap6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol-trapping ii libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System event recording an ii xlibs-data 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client data -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 274373-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 18:01:53 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 25 11:01:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CM9AH-0005Ka-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:01:53 -0700 Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 744DB68C044; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:01:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:01:50 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Processed: reopen 274373 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6zn93sY2JrH9m7VZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --6zn93sY2JrH9m7VZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:18:12PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >=20 > > reopen 274373 > Bug#274373: xlibs should have versioned dependancy to libraries packages > Bug reopened, originator not changed. With no explanation[1]? I think not. Pull this shit again and I will ask the BTS admins to suspend your ability to make changes to Debian bug reports (yes, there is a mechanism for this). Re-closing bug report due to submitter's failure to even bother rebutting the original rationale for closure. If you want to try making a case for reopening the bug, do so in discussion to the debian-x mailing list FIRST. DO NOT REOPEN THIS BUG. If you make a convincing argument in the eyes of the people on the mailing list, *I* will reopen it. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D274373&msg=3D7 --=20 G. Branden Robinson | I don't care if it has a GUI, or Debian GNU/Linux | command line, or is carved in mud [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with a sharp spoon. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Barry Smith --6zn93sY2JrH9m7VZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkF9P44ACgkQ6kxmHytGonwzvgCfYgspBDQraWA3c1fGxFQnAJ9C gT0AmgIiVhtnB1rVT+MjZ/nu+MrWxz1w =fCQN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6zn93sY2JrH9m7VZ--