Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:54:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#78787: xlibs: This bug does not exist in xfree86 4.x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2000 19:10:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 04 13:10:37 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14310X-0004ab-00; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 13:10:37 -0600
Received: (qmail 31686 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2000 18:54:23 -0000
Received: from va.debian.org (HELO klecker.debian.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2000 18:54:23 -0000
Received: from (tangent.worldvisions.ca) [204.239.180.4]
by klecker.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1430am-0007cq-00; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 10:44:00 -0800
Received: (qmail 32088 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Dec 2000 18:41:41 -0000
Date: 4 Dec 2000 18:41:41 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xlibs: Default "backspace" code is now Delete
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm not sure this is necessarily xlibs, but in some recent release of the X
software in woody, the BackSpace key no longer has become mapped to the
Delete keycode, causing all sorts of joy.
Uncommenting the right lines in /etc/X11/Xmodmap fixes it, but that
shouldn't be necessary.
This has happened to me on several computers now. If you need any other
information about my setup, please let me know.
Thanks,
Avery
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux tangent 2.2.17 #2 Tue Oct 10 15:48:06 PDT 2000 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages xlibs depends on:
ii libc6 2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii xfree86-common 4.0.1-0phase2v X Window System (XFree86) infrastructure
ii xlibs 4.0.1-8 X Window System client libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 78787-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 23:54:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 15 16:54:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ptr-64-201-187-81.ptr.terago.ca (mars.net-itech.com)
[64.201.187.81]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BEGgq-0004U7-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:54:40 -0700
Received: (qmail 21799 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 23:54:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO insight.internal.nit.ca) (192.168.12.100)
by mars.net-itech.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 23:54:35 -0000
Received: from apenwarr by insight.internal.nit.ca with local (Exim 3.34 #1
(Debian))
id 1BEGgh-0002x6-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:54:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:54:31 -0400
From: Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#78787: xlibs: This bug does not exist in xfree86 4.x
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
fine.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:12:43PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: normal
> Followup-For: Bug #78787
>
> This bug does not exist in xfree86 4.3.0, could it be closed?
>
> Denis
>
>
>
