Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #247756
Hi. The upstream tag makes sense, from what little I understand of X; I doubted this bug was caused by Debian modifications/additions per se. But given this, does it make sense for me to report the bug to upstream? Or have you already done this? And given the XF86 license issues, the creation of X.org, etc., who's "upstream" at this point? XF86? X.org? mesa.sourceforge.net? dri.sourceforge.net? I ask because if this bug is being considered upstream somewhere, I'd like to be able to follow progress, if any, and offer to provide more information as needed. Thanks, -c -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.23.040214a Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xlibmesa-dri depends on: ii xlibmesa-gl 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] -- no debconf information