Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:33:46 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#256768: xfree86: ATI Radeon 9100 IGP support needs backporting has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 23:33:55 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 28 16:33:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from s142-179-93-180.bc.hsia.telus.net (reactor-core.org) [142.179.93.180] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bf5d5-0004I6-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:33:39 -0700 Received: (qmail 19185 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jun 2004 23:33:38 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:33:38 -0700 From: Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xfree86: ATI Radeon 9100 IGP support needs backporting Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.62 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xfree86 Severity: wishlist The ATI Radeon IGP 9100 chipset from Nvidea is supported by the version of XFree86 4.3.99 that was available before the big license change. It was in the radeon driver. Can it be backported? This support is necessary for people who have Asus P4R800-VM motherboards, the VESA driver doesn't work very nicely on these motherboards. Jonathan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-k6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Eukleia: Jonathan Walther Address: 12706 99 Ave, Surrey, BC V3V2P8 (Canada) Contact: 604-582-9308 (between 7am and 10pm, PST) Website: http://reactor-core.org --------------------------------------- Received: (at 256768-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2004 23:33:47 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 16:33:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (localhost) [65.26.182.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiiOh-0002Pf-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:33:47 -0700 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E97668C047; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:33:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:33:46 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#256768: xfree86: ATI Radeon 9100 IGP support needs backporting Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TsHlYwxJd0kekxFz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --TsHlYwxJd0kekxFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote: > Package: xfree86 > Severity: wishlist You tellingly did not mention which version of xfree86 you already had installed. > The ATI Radeon IGP 9100 chipset from Nvidea is supported by the version > of XFree86 4.3.99 that was available before the big license change. It > was in the radeon driver. Can it be backported? It already has been. xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=3Dlow [...] * Backport XFree86 X server ATI driver (including Rage 128 and Radeon sub-drivers) from XFree86 CVS as of 2004-02-11. Drop superseded patches #030[a-h], #048, #049, #085, and #099. Add patch #030 which fixes driv= er to work with not-backported overhaul of X server's region macros. Resy= nc patches #022, #024, #025, #027, #069, #079, #450, #451, and #600. + add display bandwidth calculation routine to Radeon driver to fix flickering/tearing display problem (Closes: #218169) + fixes Radeon register initialization for RGB offset to fix the "milky-screen" problem (Closes: #234025) + radeon driver now supports "ForceMinDotClockOption" (Closes: #240581) [...] -- Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 25 May 2004 22:11:46 +0= 200 Closing this spurious report. In the future, please actually confirm that the bug you're reporting is applicable to the latest version of the package. --=20 G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is Debian GNU/Linux | a growing closer. It beats the [EMAIL PROTECTED] | hell out of card games. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein --TsHlYwxJd0kekxFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkDt2doACgkQ6kxmHytGonwmnwCgo/5/LF69kXo3OKuYw33aiV+Z p94An1XdGrd0saw6s1TRGId0SwZwR+UY =NIrw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TsHlYwxJd0kekxFz--