tag 257023 - moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 07:39:27AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-07-09 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm sorry, but this is simply false. Five packages in xfree86 depend on > > xlibs-data. > [5 examples for packages depending on /xlibs-data/ ] > > Please reread. I was not talking about xlibs-data but about *xlibs*. > > ----------------------- > downhill:~# apt-get -s remove xlibs > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following packages will be REMOVED: > acroread asclock auctex doomlegacy-x11 efax-gtk emacs21 eterm feh fsviewer > fsviewer-icons gcvs gdk-imlib1 geg gettext-el gtk-engines-raleigh gtkfontsel > gv html2ps imagemagick imlib-progs imlib1 krecord libast2 libdockapp-dev > libdockapp1 libgd-gd1-perl libgd-text-perl libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf2 > libgtk-imlib-perl libmagick++5.5.7 libmagick5.5.7 libplot2 libpstoedit0 > libwmf0.2-7 lincity mixer.app mtr perlmagick preview-latex pstoedit qiv > quintuple-agent realplayer rxvt slrnface ssh-askpass t1lib1 tk8.3 tk8.4 > tkcvs tkdiff tkinfo tvtime w3m-img wmmount wv xaw3dg xcolors xemacs21 > xemacs21-bin xemacs21-nomule xemacs21-support xemacs21-supportel xfig xlibs > xmms-wmdiscotux > ----------------------- > As you can see these are simply packages that have not been rebuilt > since xlibs was split and therefore _only_ depend on xlibs.
Sorry. I was apparently hitting the crack pipe. You're right. -- G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered." Debian GNU/Linux | The original Latin seems to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] | been garbled. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature