On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > So, in your opinion, is this bug: > > > > A) due to user error? > > B) due to a driver bug that is fixed in the 2004-06-17 edition of your > > driver? > > C) something else? > > Sorry for the late answer, I missed this message.
No problem. [explanation snipped] > The current SiS driver (from my website as well as in X.org and XFree86 > CVS) circumvents this situation by explicitely loading the "glx" module > as well in case DRI is to be used. Okay. I'm attempting an update of our 4.3.0 packages to the latest version of your driver. > Hence: > > While disabling/enabling DRI previously was done by > commenting/uncommenting the "Load "dri"" statement in the > Module-section, this is now done by a dedicated "DRI" option (to be > placed in the Device-section). > > Option "DRI" "off" > > disables DRI (and skips loading "dri" and "glx"). > > So, perhaps you can yourself classify the quality of this misbehavior > according to your three options ;) Heh; C) it is. :) Thanks for your reply! -- G. Branden Robinson | Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | umount;sleep
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature