Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2004 04:21:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258339: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: ATI DRI? Fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2004 23:00:05 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 16:00:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adsl-69-105-235-1.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net (tycho.timocharis.com) [69.105.235.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bihs5-0007Xh-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:00:05 -0700 Received: by tycho.timocharis.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0F9DD147A4; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dave North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: ATI DRI? Fails X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:58 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-common Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: important File: /usr/X11R6/bin/X A couple of weeks ago tuxkart & tuxracer started failing, right after update dropped a new xfree86 on me. That's basically all I know. Card is an ATI Rage 128 32MB and pretty reliable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xserver-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.29 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xfree86-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr -- debconf information: xserver-common/xwrapper/nice_value/error: xserver-common/xwrapper/allowed_users: Console Users Only xserver-common/xwrapper/actual_allowed_users: console xserver-common/xwrapper/nice_value: -10 --------------------------------------- Received: (at 258339-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 09:21:56 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 02:21:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C2RJU-00040w-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 02:21:56 -0700 Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79D9D68C002; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 04:21:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 04:21:55 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#258339: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: ATI DRI? Fails Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:38:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I am attaching a shell script called "xlibmesa-dri.bug"; please use it as > follows to send more information to this bug report. >=20 > $ ./xlibmesa-dri.bug > /tmp/output 3>&1 > $ mailx -s "Re: Bug#258339" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /tmp/output >=20 > If you do not have a "mailx" command on your system, you can get by > installing the "mailx" Debian package; for example, with the "aptitude > install mailx" or "apt-get install mailx" commands as root. Alternativel= y, > you can also use a mail command that is compatible with mailx's > command-line syntax, such as "mutt". Asked submitted for more information on 12 July. No feedback received in over a month. Closing bug from unresponsive submitter. --=20 G. Branden Robinson | Life is what happens to you while Debian GNU/Linux | you're busy making other plans. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- John Lennon http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkE1lLMACgkQ6kxmHytGonxhMwCgqsiRZWBDmzdw8mR3nGC7+edt +8kAnROlOtsBtOXSTIAlkK0+LLemxR4B =XWsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq--