Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 21:27:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 14:27:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DviZr-00053U-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:27:36 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22442
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2896BF2DC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 14679-32 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST) 13991
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LLRW7E020427;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: imake assumes availability of selinux
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xutils
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious
the xisdnutils imake run in isdnutils/xmonisdn generates:
SELINUX_LDFLAGS =
SELINUX_INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/selinux
SELINUX_CFLAGS = -DHAVE_SELINUX
SELINUX_LIBS = -lselinux
Is this intended? There's nothing why xmonisdn would need selinux.
Looks like this leeds to many FTBFS for packages.
Maybe xutils should depend on some selinux package?
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-0000z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:45:32 +0200
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit-dev libsnmpkit2c2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libsnmpkit-dev - multithreaded SNMP connection library
libsnmpkit2c2 - multithreaded SNMP connection library
Closes: 323168 323488
Changes:
snmpkit (0.9-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* for some misterious reasons, the Conflict line that is in the source
did not reach the libsnmpkit2c2 deb ; so I am rebuilding it
(closes: #323168, #323488)
Files:
0fb3ec3fcb82bec05242dbcdaed3981b 680 devel optional snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
41df9ff7d1f769b94c30c6f43d7e16b6 312171 devel optional snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
bc2d3fdca06693d8385f03fc06863b0f 159114 devel optional
libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
6733f19b9d82b6d0a2ed53acf00d157b 62148 libs optional
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBkXS9B/tjjP8QKQRAs4tAJ0QE8LO3OjauTMOzK8gWsIgJyAoMgCfYinY
7kHg0GRTScHnz4WKozTt13g=
=5w/p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
