Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:53:01 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done on both sides has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2005 10:17:19 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 02:17:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EasRj-0003Cq-B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:17:19 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 276867002; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:17:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:17:17 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system where nvidia-glx is also installed: # dpkg -i ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb (Reading database ... 126792 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace xserver-xorg 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 (using .../xserver-xorg_6= =2E8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xserver-xorg ... dpkg: error processing ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb (--in= stall): trying to overwrite /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so', which is= also in package nvidia-glx dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Please add the necessary conflicts or replaces or whatever happens to be appropriate in this case. While you're at it, this: Package: xdmx Version: 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1 Section: x11 Priority: optional Architecture: i386 Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.3.5-1), libfreetype6 (>=3D 2.1.5-1), libice6, libsm= 6, libxau6, libxaw8, libxdmcp6, libxext6, libxi6, libxmu6, libxp6, libxpm4,= libxrender1 (>> 1:0.9.0-1), libxt6, zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.2.1) Conflicts: xserver-xorg (<=3D 6.8.1-0.2) Replaces: xserver-xorg (<=3D 6.8.1-0.2) should almost certainly be a Replaces *without* a Conflicts. The Conflicts is only warranted if replacing the corresponding files from xserver-xorg causes xserver-xorg to not work correctly in some way. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDdcEtKN6ufymYLloRAs4wAJ9ezDrUNCDkwVvgPNOmPuW+OxyEtACgrs1X EkVxEH62wFeQ13DfeU3l4Sw= =Qigp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 338715-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 19:52:22 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 11:52:22 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.vif.com ([216.239.64.153] helo=buddha.vif.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Emcfl-0004PH-Pl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:52:21 -0800 Received: from [216.239.81.64] (ip216-239-81-64.vif.net [216.239.81.64]) by buddha.vif.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBEJqHiX033488 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:52:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:53:01 -0500 From: Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Done on both sides Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-vif-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-vif-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-vif-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,RCVD_IN_SORBS, RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1 Robert, britney's version-tracking unawareness is unfortunately keeping -11 from transitionning to testing until manual intervention. Also to Sven, please realize there's a reason Debian has (or hasn't) or a non-free section. If we really didn't care about anyone using non-free software, non-free wouldn't exist in the first place. Maybe 30% of installs may have an NVIDIA graphics card, and maybe 70% of installs are i386. Multiply that by the proportion of those in this case who use the non-free drivers, and you realize that if we do care about users even if they use some non-free software, dealing with this issue may save a Google session for some 10% of Sarge->Etch upgrades. Steve, please reopen if you can reproduce this (or get similar issues) with current experimental X.org and unstable nvidia-glx. If this is the case, I'd suggest debian-x to open a new bug against nvidia-glx requesting specific changes, since Randall appears to consider his part done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]