On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:53:34AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > True. But as the driver is distributed under the MIT licence, I don't > think it has to be under the "preferred form for modification". Unless > Debian requires it ?
Um, the subject is about a DFSG violation, not a licence violation. According to -legal, everything must be provided with its pure, original source -- the head of the coder that hand-wrote some firmware, the instruments used to record any particular Ogg Vorbis track, et al. Random hex constants are apparently not source in firmware (and thus distribution of such is a violation of the DFSG), but I fail to see how random hex constants are source here either. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
