reassign 385976 xtrans
tag 385976 + patch
stop
Hi,
Please find a proposed patch attached (both the patch for the Debian
package and the actual patch file are attached). (Reassigning to
xtrans because it's what the patch is against.)
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN xtrans-1.0.1.orig/Xtranssock.c xtrans-1.0.1/Xtranssock.c
--- xtrans-1.0.1.orig/Xtranssock.c 2006-06-16 00:53:55.000000000 +0200
+++ xtrans-1.0.1/Xtranssock.c 2006-09-12 19:14:13.000000000 +0200
@@ -2041,8 +2041,13 @@
errno = olderrno;
/*
- * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up
- * and we should try again.
+ * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up; we used
+ * to suggest to try again in this case with
+ * TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN, but this introduced problems for
+ * processes still referencing stale sockets in their environment.
+ * Hence, we now return a hard error, TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED, and it
+ * is suggested that higher level stacks handle retries on their
+ * level when they face a slow starting server.
*
* If the error was EWOULDBLOCK or EINPROGRESS then the socket
* was non-blocking and we should poll using select
@@ -2051,7 +2056,9 @@
* should try again.
*/
- if (olderrno == ENOENT || olderrno == EINTR)
+ if (olderrno == ENOENT)
+ return TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED;
+ else if (olderrno == EINTR)
return TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN;
else if (olderrno == EWOULDBLOCK || olderrno == EINPROGRESS)
return TRANS_IN_PROGRESS;
--- xtrans-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
+++ xtrans-1.0.1/debian/patches/series
@@ -2,0 +3 @@
+03_unix-sock-fail-fast.diff -p1
--- xtrans-1.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ xtrans-1.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+xtrans (1.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New patch, 03_unix-sock-fail-fast, to fail immediately in case a UNIX
+ socket doesn't exist; higher level stacks should retry the connection with
+ the server if they face slow starting servers. (Closes: #385976)
+
+ -- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:14:20 +0200
+
xtrans (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andres Salomon ]
--- xtrans-1.0.1.orig/Xtranssock.c
+++ xtrans-1.0.1/Xtranssock.c
@@ -2041,8 +2041,13 @@
errno = olderrno;
/*
- * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up
- * and we should try again.
+ * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up; we used
+ * to suggest to try again in this case with
+ * TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN, but this introduced problems for
+ * processes still referencing stale sockets in their environment.
+ * Hence, we now return a hard error, TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED, and it
+ * is suggested that higher level stacks handle retries on their
+ * level when they face a slow starting server.
*
* If the error was EWOULDBLOCK or EINPROGRESS then the socket
* was non-blocking and we should poll using select
@@ -2051,7 +2056,9 @@
* should try again.
*/
- if (olderrno == ENOENT || olderrno == EINTR)
+ if (olderrno == ENOENT)
+ return TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED;
+ else if (olderrno == EINTR)
return TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN;
else if (olderrno == EWOULDBLOCK || olderrno == EINPROGRESS)
return TRANS_IN_PROGRESS;
--- xtrans-1.0.1.orig/debian/patches/03_unix-sock-fail-fast.diff
+++ xtrans-1.0.1/debian/patches/03_unix-sock-fail-fast.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+diff -urN xtrans-1.0.1.orig/Xtranssock.c xtrans-1.0.1/Xtranssock.c
+--- xtrans-1.0.1.orig/Xtranssock.c 2006-06-16 00:53:55.000000000 +0200
++++ xtrans-1.0.1/Xtranssock.c 2006-09-12 19:14:13.000000000 +0200
+@@ -2041,8 +2041,13 @@
+ errno = olderrno;
+
+ /*
+- * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up
+- * and we should try again.
++ * If the error was ENOENT, the server may be starting up; we used
++ * to suggest to try again in this case with
++ * TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN, but this introduced problems for
++ * processes still referencing stale sockets in their environment.
++ * Hence, we now return a hard error, TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED, and it
++ * is suggested that higher level stacks handle retries on their
++ * level when they face a slow starting server.
+ *
+ * If the error was EWOULDBLOCK or EINPROGRESS then the socket
+ * was non-blocking and we should poll using select
+@@ -2051,7 +2056,9 @@
+ * should try again.
+ */
+
+- if (olderrno == ENOENT || olderrno == EINTR)
++ if (olderrno == ENOENT)
++ return TRANS_CONNECT_FAILED;
++ else if (olderrno == EINTR)
+ return TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN;
+ else if (olderrno == EWOULDBLOCK || olderrno == EINPROGRESS)
+ return TRANS_IN_PROGRESS;
