On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:23:58AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > * Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 07:42 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > * David Nusinow wrote: > > > [...] > > > > [1] xterm needs an update, and compiz should ship with 0.2 for > > > > example... > > > > > > compiz 0.2 needs metacity >= 2.15.21, which is very unlikely to go into > > > etch > > > according to the GNOME maintainers. I may take a look at the code to see > > > how > > > difficult it will be to patch it for the metacity that's going to go into > > > etch. > > > > compiz could always be built without metacity theme support, couldn't > > it? > > It probably can. While it's certainly not the optimal solution, I guess it's > a good compromise for etch.
Is the diff between what we have and 0.2 that big? Could we just backport the interesting fixes that don't break this instead? - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
