On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Brice Goglin wrote: [...] > > Backtrace: > > 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354] > > 1: [0xb7ef6420] > > 2: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x81) [0x8086b91] > > 3: /usr/bin/X(main+0x489) [0x806e699] > > 4: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc8) [0xb7d00ea8] > > 5: /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xa9) [0x806d9d1] > > This backtrace looks similar to #410696 and #410386. But, these bugs > have nothing to do with suspending. Did you guys ever get such a crash > without suspending?
No. More precisely: * If I suspend to disk, then I have a high probability of getting a crash on restore. I'd say at least 3 out of 4 (initially it seemed pretty much systematic). * If I suspend to memory, then there is no crash. * I never got any problem in normal use. * I don't know if it is alternating suspend to memory and suspend to disk that causes the problem. I could check that. -- Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fgouget.free.fr/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]