Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197155: xbase-clients.postinst should generate Xft index
in font directories
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xbase-clients
Severity: normal
xbase-clients.postinst should invoke xftcache in font directories.
The Type1 packages doesn't depend on xbase-clients and xftcache should
be invoked in cases when xbase-clients is installed after all font
packages.
I am not sure but it seams that xutils is a better place for xftcache.
There are more library dependencies of xftcache though.
Anton Zinoviev
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 18:33:47 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Severity: normal
>
> xbase-clients.postinst should invoke xftcache in font directories.
> The Type1 packages doesn't depend on xbase-clients and xftcache should
> be invoked in cases when xbase-clients is installed after all font
> packages.
>
> I am not sure but it seams that xutils is a better place for xftcache.
> There are more library dependencies of xftcache though.
>
xftcache doesn't exist anymore, so I think this report isn't relevant
these days.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
