There was a google summer of code about the integration of nx and xorg. Nobody did it :-(
I understand all the concerns about creating a "clean" package. But what about a semi-ufficial package (maybe for experimental) until things will change? As all of you already said on the pkg-nx-group mailing list, Suse and redhat do this, and event support it with security patches. So why we can't do it? I don't want to start a religious flame. Like we do with ati and nvidia closed drivers we could write on the description why freenx and nx is bad. Then the user will choose to use it or not. What I can use in alternative to NX? (I've tried xrdp, but I missed some things about it's configuration). Bye, Emilio Il Tuesday 08 January 2008 14:37:08 Alexander Wirt ha scritto: > Timo Aaltonen schrieb am Tuesday, den 08. January 2008: > > Hi, > > *snip* > > > Does freenx still ship it's own X libs? It would be nice to integrate the > > funcionality in Xorg. > > > > I've tried updating freenx in the past, and the experience was awful (and > > it failed, obviously). > > Last time I looked freenx was a shell script around the normal nx stuff. > > Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]