On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:36:26PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:52:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: ... > > Also debian/copyright confuses me, it says the code is MIT, but somehow > > upstream has GPL-2 in COPYING, and the above patch says it's GPL as > > well. Could you clarify this? > > what a mess! the source files are definitly MIT, I'm pretty sure I asked > upstream about the COPYING file long time ago, I'll see if I can find > that discussion again, or even ask him again. > Although I'm quite sure our conversation ended up with him saying the > software is indeed MIT licensed.
I found the old discussion. At that time I pointed out the misleading COPYING file, but I guess he never got around to amend it. I'll point it out again. -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
