On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:52:11 +0900, ishikawa,chiaki wrote: > This is the libGL files under /usr/lib: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2009-01-05 11:29 libGL.so -> libGL.so.1 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2009-02-20 01:07 libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 556108 2009-01-12 09:53 libGL.so.1.2 > > Do they look like they came from fglrx?
They don't look like they come from libgl1-mesa-glx in any case: $ dpkg -c /org/ftp.root/debian/pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-glx_7.0.3-7_i386.deb | grep libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- root/root 397196 2008-12-14 06:02 ./usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-12-14 06:02 ./usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 Does apt-get install --reinstall libgl1-mesa-glx fix the problem? > It would be mighty handy if there is consolidated tool to figure out > the origin of these X library files. > (Now I am beginning to realize why it was > so difficult to figure out which package provides libGL.*. > I tried by searching Debian packages, but was not so sure. > From what you suggest, it seems to me that there are non-Debian packages (or > deb packages that are prepared by a third party) that provides the libraries > in question. Hmm...) > Yes, it's a mess. The debian packages for fglrx and nvidia use dpkg-divert to install their libGL and move mesa's out of the way. I don't know what the vendor-provided installers do, but it's quite possible they don't bother with this and just replace the already installed libGL. Thanks for following up! Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org