On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 01:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390? > > > > > If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian unstable. > > Sorry for raising this question, but I thought the patched package was > built automatically by the buildds. Is this a manual thing? Then I > really apologize. I just tried to point out that the problems were not > only affecting i386 users. This was also reflected by some of the many > bug reports. However, since the bug was solved for i386 (and s390) > users it will be removed. The problem still remains for other architectures. > Is there no way to tell for which architectures the bugs are reported to. > I did not find any bug report tags or pseudoheaders for this! I beg to > continue to use Debian unstable, you are doing a very good job!
Taking a closer look at the bug report 548716 from Pancho Horrillo shows that he has an amd64 box, so this bug should not be closed until 1.6.4-2 is available for that architecture. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
