On 2010-03-28 19:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 19:25:43 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> The decision to put the snapshot-date file into the upstream-ubuntu >> branch is not exactly stellar either, I would like to keep this and >> other generated files out of the upstream-experimental branch (undoing >> the merge with the upstream-ubuntu branch). >> > ack.
I have now redone the work, pulling directly from upstream into the upstream-experimental branch. Since we need to make a new tarball anyway to include the ChangeLog file, and the (few) commits since the Ubuntu checkout seem rather safe, I pulled everything up to commit 7858345b. The following one (e2146d3b, "Fix for the latest nouveau_class.h.") would break with our libdrm, AFAICS. Also, xsfbs is merged from git://git.debian.org/pkg-xorg/xsfbs. > for all other X drivers we ship the pristine tarball, but delete the > generated files on clean and run autoreconf on build. For nouveau you > could do something similar I think. Could the get-orig-source target be > a simple invocation of git archive, until the driver gets a real > release? It's not quite as simple since we want the ChangeLog file included, but I edited debian/rules to run autoreconf at build time rather than in the get-orig-source target. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrwtna86....@turtle.gmx.de
