On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > So /etc/pam.d/xdm will stay as-is for now, and this bug will hopefully
> > be fixed by the pam package in the lenny+1 timeframe.
> >
> I think this has now happened. Can you still reproduce this bug?
By sticking an "auth sufficient" into common-auth? Sure. But then
again, I've converted libpam-opie to use pam-auth-update (#553416), so
it's no longer a problem for me.
I can't say I understand such a reluctance to simply flipping the two
chunks in pam.d/xdm, but I don't really care at this point. This will
only affect people clinging to old PAM conffiles, or sticking stuff into
them taken from a 2006 post they found on Google. Not my problem.
I'll let you and Steve figure out whether to close this report, leave it
open, or merge it with #553416.
--
Why are there always boycotts? Shouldn't there be girlcotts too?
-- argon on #Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100409014737.ga14...@toroia.fbriere.dyndns.org
