On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > Perhaps we need a good single tag these could all be unified under. > The ::rpc tag might work, but does it belong under devel::? > Or perhaps we need a full set of categories that divide the field up > neatly. Any suggestions?
I would like to keep the 'protocol' facet as a big flat registry of protocols for/with which the application does something relevant. The recent thread about instant messaging has shown quite well how protocols can be hard to categorise, as they're pure instruments that can be used reused and abused at will for any purpose. In this respect, I'd definitely go with protocol::soapand protocol::xmlrpc. More generic tags like ::rpc could better belong under 'devel', I agree. To summarise, we can add: protocol::soam protocol::xmlrpc devel::rpc is there already. What was the problem with it? Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
