On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:15:23PM -0400, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > Good we speak a common language: Perl....
Yup! :) > You might consider reviewing the tags the tagger disagrees with too. > There was a human being tagging in the first place, and he/she might > have more insight into the package under review than the AI-tagger. I have some updates. The outcome of the experiment wasn't too bad, but the tagger was a bit too slow to try it heavily tweaking the options. Testing took roughly about 2 seconds per package. While I was waiting, I have a look around and found a new entry called "dbacl", which does (wow!) bayesian categorization. So I also gave a try to that one. I committed the testing scripts I've made: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debtags/autodebtag/trunk/dbacl/mkpkgs Creates a directory with package information, one file per package. This can be used as a token cache to train dbacl faster. svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debtags/autodebtag/trunk/dbacl/train This creates training data for dbacl for one tag. svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debtags/autodebtag/trunk/dbacl/test This asks dbacl if it thinks that package belongs to that tag. One could do more things, like giving dbacl a set of categories (all tags, even) and ask it in which ones it thinks the package fits. (WOW) Mornfall did a bit of experiments on this front as well. It's all quite exciting! Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
