On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:45:12AM +0100, Torsten Marek wrote:
> > Tag: protocol::oscar
> > Description: blah
> > Tagging-hints:
> > Please consider tagging your package with works-with::im:licq
> > or works-with::im:aim
> I think this could be handled via "Implies:", but I have to admit, to my own
> shame, that I don't know whether this is actually handled by libtagcoll or
> only
> a comment in the tagset.
> In this case, works-with::im:{aim,icq} would imply protocol::oscar.Implies is currently totally ignored by libtagcoll. The reason is that I feel that it's better to do all this automatic tag inference in the autodebtag script, and to provide clients with a nice and complete tag database. > Apart from that, I agree with you that we should keep the tagging info apart > from the description itself. Again, my knowledge about the internals of > libtagcoll is too limited, and I don't know how much work it would be to > include > a further info fields. All unknown fields are just ignored, so you can type in anything you like. > > Yeah, I really prefer this idea, because it make the information > > available for the tagging tools. > Exactly, and it hides the information from the normal users that just want to > know about a tag. I like it too! We could call the field just "Hints:". Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
