Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Definitely I agree, I also think "suite" suites (:)) more than "task", > but the clash with dak terminology still holds. Maybe explaining in > some document the difference of the two uses of "suite" would be > enough to avoid confusion.
It seems to me that dak's the one in the wrong here, but obviously it's too late to fix that to use "branch"... How about changing the debtags "suite::" facet to "project::" - it works neatly for project::gnome, ::debian-med, etc. On the other hand, it doesn't suit the gkrellm-plugin packages etc. Yes, in an ideal world it would make sense for those to be handled via Enhances: control-fields instead of via debtags, but it would be a pity to throw out all that existing tag information while the developers show so little enthusiasm for Enhances:. (Can anyone suggest a way of promoting the use of Enhances:, other than by pelting people with wishlist bugreports?) -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
