On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:58:20AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > > 20:52 #ekhis < bmesing> hmm, what's the use for a JDK? > > 20:52 #ekhis < bmesing> There is no use:developing available as far as I > > see. > > I'm in favour of such a tag. The idea came out (again) recently in the > > list: > > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2006-November/001422.html > > It's the second time it came out, and I'm starting to consider that even > > if in the previous thread we didn't reach a consensus on it, I should > > just add it. > I agree. Otherwise the use::axis is incomplete in an important area. > However, one problem might be naming this tag. As mornfall points out in > the thread you mention, "to develop" has a lot of meanings > (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/develop). Perhaps the full tag name could > be somewhat more descriptive? > Perhaps: "Software Development" - though this might imply something to > big. > Hmm, looking at the devel:: facet, we could use its description for the > use::devel tag, which is indeeed "Software Development".
After looking at the dictionary, I think use::developing is ok. Then it could even be used besides software development, like for example with field::electronics, or for game sdk (use::development + game::adventure). So I intend to add this in a couple of days: Tag: use::developing Description: Development > Feel free to quote me on debtags-devel. /me waves :) Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
