On 21/06/07, Justin B Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Glassey wrote: > > Hi, > > I maintain the packages bibletime and gnomesword which are bible > > browsing packages. I know there are other packages in the archive that > > cover different religious texts. > > Also a couple of religious-calendar apps, etcetera.
Indeed. > > Would it be a good idea to have either, > > a field:religion (or wherever religion would be appropriate) > > field::religion... that's an interesting idea. We may need to > specify in the Description that Vi/Emacs doesn't count. > > > or culture:christianity, culture:islam, culture:judaism ... > > To me this has always sounded like more potential trouble than it's > worth. Despite the name, the culture:: facet is really used for > locales. Yes, that makes sense. I'd certainly prefer field::religion Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
