What does networksolutions and verisign fail that you whitelist them? Darrell
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request Would you mind sharing your list? Mine, sadly enough, only has 8 rules currently, all except two are for mailing I get that are false positives. My current list is: MAILFROM 0 STARTSWITH [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @declude.com MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @verisign.com MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @verisign.net MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @networksolutions.com MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS aarl.org MAILFROM 0 STARTSWITH bounce-ethnicjokes- BODY 0 CONTAINS Beliefnet, Inc. All rights reserved. So far the list only includes entries I have had problems in the past with, the verisign ones were whitelist entries, and I may refine them to specific mailings from them. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Kaylor, Domain Mail Administrator Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request That's what I did...using the address list, I give it a weight of -140, which is more than the total of ALL of my tests added together... Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Frolick Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request I decided I will start using filter file to "whitelist" legitimate mailing lists from listservers that also support spammers, since they seem to be the bulk of my false positives. I am giving them all 0 weight in the list, but will give the whole test a very high negative weight. I currently only have a few examples, since I am not that aggressive yet in my weights, but I welcome any suggestions. This should allow everyone to be much more aggressive. Maybe a version of the filter test that is a whitelist wouldn't be a bad idea. The filter tests allow for more flexability than the standard whitelist, leaving in many cases less room for error. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request Rick, I completely agree with you. I don't like risking corruption to the global.cfg file through a ASP/CGI script error. Our idea is to "turn up" the weight tests and whitelist all of our customer base. The external whitelsit makes it easier to keep that update. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request > > > Hi Bob, > There are a few reasons I want/need the whitelist separate. > One being that it will be easy to push a copy of the > whitelist via ftp to each relevant system instead of manually > or programaticly attaching to each server and editing the > global.cfg. Secondly the global.cfg file is basicly static > infomation aside from the whitelist, so interfacing with it > programaticly seems like wasted effort to me. I don't believe > Scott intended the whitelist to be used as much as it is but > unfortunately the amount of legit servers needing > whitelisting is enough to make the whitelist an important > feature of Declude. > > The level of modification will just be adding and removing > white and black list entries as well as word and phrase > filter lines. We can do this via the web and email. > > Have a great day! > Rick Davidson > Buckeye Internet Services > www.buckeyeweb.com > 440-953-1900 > - > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Shubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request > > > > Rick, > > > > I too am planning to advance Declude administration to my > users via a > > web application. Although I saw no reason why I couldn't > > programmaticaly change the global.cfg and other files. Could I ask > > your reasoning? Also, to what level of modification do you > anticipate. > > The numerous options that declude allows for will make 100% remote > > editing quite a challange. Thanks for your input. > > > > Bob > > > > Rick Davidson wrote: > > > > > > Howdy Scott, > > > Was wondering if you would consider creating a separate whitelist > > > file > for > > > management purposes. Currently I have one customer with 4 Imail > > > servers peered as a single domain across the country (US :-) I > > > maintain master > black > > > lists and word filters on my workstation and use a batch > file to FTP > them to > > > each server. Also, we are developing some web based > management tools > > > for Declude and would rather not have to programmaticly access the > global.cfg > > > file. > > > > > > Figured I would ask :-) > > > > > > Have a great day! > > > Rick Davidson > > > Buckeye Internet Services > > > www.buckeyeweb.com > > > 440-953-1900 > > > - > > > > > > --- > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > --- > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > and type > > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the > Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an > E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe > Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- > [This E-mail scanned for > viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner] > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
