Does anyone know what would be less processor intensive for Declude; whitelisting a TO address or setting custom actions for the TO address?
The end result for us is the same so it doesn't matter which one I do, I'd just like to do the one that is less rescource intensive.
Currently, both use about the same amount of resources. However, it's likely that in the future the WHITELIST TO will be able to use less resources, so I would recommend using that.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
