> Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use: > > COMMENTS comments weight x 5 0 > > where the test will accumulate the total number of obfuscation comments it > finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight result for the > test.
So which is a preferrable approach? I've added the COMMENTS20,40,60,80,100 lines to Global, and WARN actions in $default$, so I'm guessing it's set now, but if this way is easier, I'd switch. Right now no weight is added, and just warnings are added to the headers. 80 + 100 are set to HOLD for review. Thanks all! Paul --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
