Hello, John,
In my opinion there's definite value in the HOLD action.  I'll tell you how
I have things setup and perhaps you can see it as well.

When I first setup Declude JunkMail I analyzed incoming e-mail on our
primary domain NEXUSTECHGROUP.COM for a couple of days to come up with what
I considered a good HOLD weight for the types of spam that we receive.  The
HOLD weight that I decided on was 8.  I have $default$.junkmail configured
so that any e-mail with a weight of 8 or above has the HOLD action taken on
it.  What HOLD does is drop all of those e-mails which are held into an
actual directory called \imail\spool\hold.  I tried to make the HOLD weight
be high enough so that as little legit e-mail as possible was being caught
yet the bulk of the spam that we were receiving was being caught.  8 just
happened to be a good number for this domain but there's no reason that
would be the best for another domain.

Then I started using a program called SpamReview (which has a link on the
DJM website).  SpamReview allows you to quickly scan the messages in the
HOLD directory and see if any of them are legit e-mail, e.g. False
Positives.  If I come across a False Positive I take a look at the e-mail
and see if there's any adjustments I can make to some of my custom filters
to allow that type of e-mail to pass through without being held the next
time.  Over time these exceptions added up so that any legit e-mail which
had been caught was being passed through and I was coming across less and
less False Positives.

Now, as you, I also realized after awhile that I was having to scan through
a heck of a lot of e-mail just to get to a couple of False Positives.  I
also noticed that a lot of the e-mail that I was scanning was easily
identified by DJM as Spam and typically these easily identifiable messages
had been assigned a very high weight because they had failed so many tests.
At that point I decided to implement a DELETE weight in addition to a HOLD
weight.

A DELETE weight is just a level at which I can be 100% (or as close to it as
possible) sure that e-mail with that weight or higher is spam.  I started
with a DELETE weight of 60.  A DELETE weight of 60 made it so I only had to
look at 1000 message a day with SpamReview.  I then lowered it by 5 points.
Just lowering it by 5 points meant I only had to look at 750 messages a day.
And I kept lowering it until I came to a level where I didn't feel like I
was going to unintentionally delete e-mail and yet the amount of e-mail I
had to look at on a given day was minimal.  Right now when things are going
well I have to look at around 100 messages a day for false positives.  I
usually do this in the morning and it takes me about 10 minutes each day.
This is with a HOLD weight of 40.  Again 40 is a good DELETE weight for me.
You might need something different.

Now as spammers have adapted I noticed the amount of messages that I was
reviewing started to creep up.  This meant spammers were taking steps to
make their e-mail to look more like legit e-mail hence lowering the score.
At that point I started to add more teeth to my tests and where before I was
taking steps to pass through former False Positives without being caught
additionally I was now taking steps to push e-mail that I was forced to
review above my DELETE weight.

My morning maintence routine for spam tweaking is something like...

1) Scan SpamReview for False Positives - Make adjustments in DJM tests to
lower number of False Positives.
2) Look at End-User Spam Reports (Messages forwarded to me by end users as
spam they would preferred to have blocked) - Make adjustments in DJM tests
to make sure that SPAM doesn't get through anymore.
3) Use SpamReview to look at mail that was legitimately identified as
SPAM. - Make adjustments in DJM to push that above DELETE weight so I don't
have to look at it next time.

I think currently I spend about 20 minutes a day on this.  But after a
couple of weeks I'll spend less time on it.  And typically there will be a
surge in the methods of the spammers which will cause my time spent to rise
again.  And then I will adjust accordingly and time spent will go down and
level out again and then rise.  It's sort of cyclical in nature.

Eventually I'm hoping to have my system (and I assume DJM will have the
tests) so that the peaks and valleys in the cycle start to look more like
rolling plains and less like jagged mountains, meaning I know what to expect
on any given day, but for the time being their is definitely a war being
waged out there between the spam senders and the spam filterers and that's
basically the mentality you need to keep at it.  Someday the anti-spam
panacea might exist but for now I think DJM is as close as you can get given
the current nature of E-mail transport.

Just my 2 cents,
Dan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Purnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hold action


> I'm not seeing the value in the hold action... does this mean that an
> administrator type has to search the server's hold directory periodically
> and scroll through messages looking for false positives?  Then I assume
you
> would want to manually move them back into the recipient's inbox? Seems
> like an unending thankless task which noone really has time for, in
> addition to filling up the HDD with spam.
>
> Am I right in understanding that the hold action simply puts the email in
a
> separate directory? Or am I missing something?
>
> so far I've seen no false positives on weight10, so I'm just about ready
to
> start deleting.  I see many of you with much higher weights for
> hold/delete.  Maybe because you "provide" email to clients and you need to
> let them make their own decisions?  (I'm a small company and can afford to
> make those command decisions for my users.)
>
> Thanks.
> John.
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
> http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group 
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to