That was the Trustic model, and its founder, Mark Fletcher, shut down the
service after less than a year declaring the experiment a failure:

"We regret to inform you that we are no longer taking registrations and will
soon be closing the service. We have determined that the system as it
currently is designed will not achieve the level of accuracy that we
require, and an inaccurate system is worse than no system."

In a later e-mail, Mark explained:

"The reason we pulled Trustic was because the underlying data submitted by
the users was too unreliable. People are lazy (not a cut-down, just a fact).
People will gladly forward messages they consider spam, but they won't stop
and make sure they are really spam. And they won't consider if the messages
originated from a large ISP that has a generally good record at spam
prevention. This will always result in listings of ISPs that should not be
listed, unless you come up with arbitrary thresholds and internal
whitelists. The goal of Trustic was to not be arbitrary, for everything to
be based on user recommendations. That's why we couldn't do that. Also,
people will not submit positive recommendations in any proportion to the
negative recommendations they'll submit, even if it's easy to do."

I think Mark was right.  If you make it too easy for people to report spam
by automating the reporting process, you will end up with a database that is
virtually worthless due to the lack of personal involvement in the
validation and verification process, and like Mark said, "an inaccurate
system is worse than no system."

Bill
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop news


>
> May be a commercial enterprise will be more open to adding a "hands-off"
> reporting system.  Manually confirming every spam that I already
determined
> as spam makes the system not practical.
>
> What they need is a commercial (for fee) account which includes the
> (revocable) right to submit directly into their system.
>
> Best Regards
> Andy Schmidt
>
> Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
> Fax:    +1 201 934-9206
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to