Hi Scott: >> The IPs that we list are those that were sending viruses in the past; therefore, they will likely be sending spam in the future. <<
I wonder, whether most "corporate" PCs (with identifiable, fix IP addresses) are more likely to be protected behind firewalls or mail servers with virus scanners - while "consumer" workstations (with always-changing dynamic/dial-up dsl/cable) ip addresses are more likely to be clueless and thus more likely to be infected. So - if some dial-up/dynamic PC gets infected, that IP address will likely be assigned to someone else who happens to connect tomorrow? Is your test eliminating any "dial-up/dynamic" IPs, since by definition the infected/spam workstation will change IPs? How do you account for businesses using Internet gateways, firewalls, NAT routers etc where one IP address could feasible represent a large number of different workstations? I have some concerns, how reliable such a test possibly can be, if it doesn't have an aggressive "automatic de-listing" policy (similar to Spamcop's). Best Regards Andy Schmidt H&M Systems Software, Inc. 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203 Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846 Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
