Why not just block them from connecting to your server altogether??? Block
their ip addresses.


Kevin Bilbee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 4:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH action
>
>
> I was trying to add a message to the message that was being received.
> These boneheads from aim-ag.com hit us with 2,300 messages in under one
> just before noon and this isn't the first time that this happened.  They
> forge the From address to say that is is coming from the same address as
> the To address.  I get the feeling that just ROUTETO'ing back to them
> would cause them to think that we originally sent it, but who knows.  I
> did take all 2,300 of today's messages from a COPYFILE capture and sent
> them back to three of their public addresses by modifying the Q file and
> I also inserted a strongly worded message into the D file.  Hopefully
> that will be enough for them to get the picture.  It sucks to have 2,300
> messages land in your inbox, and my intention was to have this stuff
> automatically get bounced to all three addresses until they stopped.
> Unfortunately asking them to stop was ineffective.
>
> So anyway, it doesn't look like ATTACH is a good answer for this
> considering that the client's domain is only being gatewayed, but
> hopefully my previous actions will cause them to fix it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> I need to use the ATTACH action to bounce back unwanted E-mails to a
> >> single source that has been bombarding us with thousands of unwanted
> >> E-mails from a misconfigured automated system (it's some financial
> >> institution in Austria).  I have followed the instructions on how to
> >> ATTACH, but I am still wondering if this is a final action, i.e. do I
> >> need to still do a DELETE action on the E-mail or will ATTACH keep it
> >> from hitting the original recipient?
> >
> >
> > The ATTACH action will deliver the E-mail to the original recipient.
> > In this case, you could use ROUTETO to cause the E-mail to go back to
> > the sender ("TESTNAME ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]"), which would
> > prevent the original recipient from seeing the E-mail.
> >
> >                                                    -Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> --
> =====================================================
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =====================================================
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to