> 1) Do other people want this functionality in external > apps such as Sniffer (please speak up if either for or > against being able to score multiple hits)? > 2) Would Declude be willing to introduce the functionality?
Regarding SPAMCHK I can't see any benefit for bitmask return codes. We understand SPAMCHK as a little crowd of content based tests like already existing ones (BASE64, SPAMHEADERS or similar) So the cumulative result of this SpamChk-tests would be a certain weight that will become part of Declude's final weight. The only thing that would be usefull is, if we can differentiate between positive and negative results. Or in other words: If we want to combine or analyze SpamChk results it's not so important if the result was +10 or +40. But it's a big difference if the result was -10 or +10. I'm not sure if signed variables could do this for us by using a bitmask tecnique. And I'm also not sure if it's tecnicaly possible to use bitmasks since the current interface for external tests is the DOS exit-code. As I know a value between 0 and 255 ... nothing more. Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
