I have attachments set at 4MG and these are only around 1MB..so I dont think that is it..

Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247.5555 Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:01 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kodak EZ Share

All these get held on my system because you send it from �your� e-mail address without authenticating, so it never gets whitelisted with Whitelist Auth and it fails my spam domains test.  But if you aren�t seeing them at all, I�d guess it is the attachment size.

 

Marc

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Kodak EZ Share

 

I have Kodak EZ Share that allows you to take pictures with your digital camera and email them out...when I email them to myself from another computer I never get them unless I tell it to send as is..if I choose "Best for email" I wont get them. Other customers are telling me they are not getting pictures either...

 

I am trying to figure out why..I have taken out all my Imail rules and all .zip files from the virus config...and by the way...it won't even send them to an account that I have whitelisted..

 

Does anyone know where I could look to find out why I am not getting them..they go to my yahoo.com account just fine..and I have tried to decipher the log files with no luck.....

 

Could it be the virus program is deleting them?  I use FPROT..

 

I am sure there are more customers that are not getting pictures that I have not heard from yet..


Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247.5555 Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"

----- Original Message -----

From: Scott Fisher

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:36 PM

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption

 

It's the same log format except that all the messages for a specific email are grouped together. Well most of the time they are grouped together.

It does make eyeball parsing of the log easier.

 

I load the logs into a database daily. With the 1.8x versions, I'll need to code around a new type of log corruption every one to two months.

For the 3 days I was running 2.x, I had to code around 4 new corruption issues.

Visually there is also more corruption.

 

Odd things is that I never get log corruption in message sniffer. So somebody is writing out logs that don't get corrupt.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Matt

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:16 PM

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption

 

There has always been corruption of the logs.  What seems to have changed here is that there is a new log format and the programmed exceptions in DLanalyzer are no longer able to handle the types of corruption as seamlessly as in the past.

I haven't seen the new log format, but I would imagine that if they built it in a column format and kept it to a single line, similar to Web logging standards, it should be even easier to parse the data and correct for issues.  If they didn't keep to consistent columns, then this could be just as big of an issue to parse as before and a lot of the exception rules would have to be rewritten for the new format.

Matt



Goran Jovanovic wrote:

Yesterday's report on my declude logfile showed
 
=...................................1........0.01%
02/28/2005..........................1........0.01%
FF156FB0094D05A.....................1........0.01%
I005................................1........0.01%
QCEA370970074D08A...................1........0.01%
SET.................................1........0.01%
SNIFFQCE053ABD0086D062..............1........0.01%
 
This is from 
 
Total Messages Processed: 12,316
 
And loglevel set to HIGH and the size of the file is 122 MB
 
I am running 2.0.5 
 
 
     Goran Jovanovic
     The LAN Shoppe
 
 
 
  
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption
 
I had the opposite experience.  Back at, oh, 1.7x I ran on LOGLEVEL
HIGH, and had lots of log corruption.  I had to drop down to MID.  The
increase in spam volume made it such that at MID, I had lots of log
corruption again.
 
With 2.x and the lines being written in a batch, I noticed an
    
immediate
  
drop in my disk usage and a huge drop in corrupted lines.
 
Andrew 8)
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption
 
 
Hi,
 
Yesterday was actually a good day (here a snippet):
 
TEST             # FAILED   Percentage
18:51:58................1........0.01%
SNIF02/28/2005..........1........0.01%
SPA02/28/2005...........1........0.01%
WEIG02/28/2005..........1........0.01%
 
Sure, I used to get reports that were "clean", but considering it only
happens a "few" times a day, I don't consider it a major issue and I
    
can
  
live with it.
 
Also I used to run in MID log level, but after 1.76 (or so), they
removed the test summary line form MID level, and I needed to switch
    
to
  
HIGH log level.  It's entirely possible that the log corruption is not
really specific to 2.0x - but rather a secondary result because they
forded me to deal with tremendously large log files (vs. the old MID
    
log
  
files).
 
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
 
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
 
Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206
 
http://www.HM-Software.com/
 
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
    
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  



-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

Reply via email to