And that would be why I'm not a lawyer...<grin>...but I didn't mean to imply this was a guilt or innocence case...just that if the jury is trying to determine a settlement, then a good argument that the plaintiff was partially at fault for revealing the sensitive information would reduce or possible eliminate any settlement amount.
Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Frolick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darin Cox" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Legalities of adding header info Hello Darin, Friday, April 8, 2005, 10:07:51 AM, you wrote: DC> Certainly true...but in the case of reasonable doubt <grin>, a good lawyer DC> could use that argument well....but hopefully it won't come to that. DC> Darin. Civil cases do not require 'beyond a reasonable doubt', only criminal. -- Best regards, Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
