Andy, BLAT is great for scripting, but I don't think that you want to create such a dependency within Declude, and I could see this causing issues on some systems since this would be handled outside of the standard process. Since they already have a mail server to work with, I would start there. Just a personal opinion of course. In the context of backscatter, I have turned off every bounce in Declude except for banned extensions which exclude encrypted zips. I still generate backscatter, primarily from broken viruses, but it's not generally an issue unless a virus is prone to corruption. So for me, it's not as big of an issue as it is for others, and I believe that backscatter is a larger issue that needs to be dealt with. Considering that it is likely possible to generate bounces with IMail and SmarterMail though, and considering that it is proper and I assume RCF compliant to do so, I would think that they should add this to a short list. If so, they should also generate a Return-Path header for the null sender in order to keep pace with evolving standards. Matt Andy Schmidt wrote:
-- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
Title: Message
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-respo... Colbeck, Andrew
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Limitation -> S... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Limitation -&g... Matt