Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

[Mailing Lists]

Also I hope the issue of orphaned emails is being addressed with Declude and SM.   This is a real pain, we had to go to back to Declude 2.0.5.76 because 2.0.6 release would break up the hdr and eml files (so you would get orphaned hdr in the /proc and .eml in the spool). 2.0.5.76 doesnt check for emails forgotten by declude so we check the /proc directory with a script. Obviosuly this is not the best way to run a mail server.   I believe we worked with Ralph on this issue for several months, but no solution yet.   Sal ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Billman To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:52 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Thanks Mike. We are making great progress.  We’ve managed to address the issues and make Declude far more efficient.  Internal testing is beginning.  I believe that you will be pleased with the performance and resource utilization of this version.  Too early for me to make specific claims but I’m very optimistic from a stability and performance perspective.   Bill Billman Declude   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:47 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update   Any new news on this issue? Basically, version 2.X is useless to me. If there is any way I can assist by sending debug info, lmk. --Mike TNWEB   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Billman Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 15:24 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update You’re spot on Mike.  In cases like this it comes down to finding the circumstances that trigger the problem and then simulating those conditions.  It is difficult but at the very least a potential problem is identified and removed.  If all goes well analysis of the fix and conditions will give a high degree of confidence that the target problem is the one that has been fixed.  That confidence will grow as testing without failure continues through beta.   Bill   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:51 PM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Brief Update        This one must be a bugger - we changed nothing in our configuration and the SMTPd memory problem has not reoccurred since May 29.  So how is it possible to test unless it can be reproduced?       ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Billman To: Declude.Virus@declude.com ; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:13 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] Brief Update   Hi Folks,   Declude development is still in the process of investigating issues surrounding resource utilization and we will report back in two weeks or sooner if possible.     -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005   -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.13/47 - Release Date: 7/12/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.13/47 - Release Date: 7/12/2005