|
No they weren't held by hijack. The only ones that
were held by hijack that day were a bunch of messages to Declude notifying them
that it had been installed. I still don't know why it needed to send so
many messages to them about that. There were 40-something in the hold2,
which means it must have sent over 80 messages. They were all from IP
127.0.0.1.
BTW: I just want to thank all of you for offering your
suggestions and trying to help. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:06 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with Declude 3 Check the Hijack logs to see if the message might have been held. When messages are held by HOLD1 of Hijack and then released, they are directly placed back into the spool and handed to Imail. As such, no further processing is done by Declude, including no Declude headers.
John T eServices For You
-----Original
Message-----
Yes I am running Hijack.
In response to Matt's post, the services were not restarted anywhere near the time that the messages came through. It came in, according to the headers I posted in the OP, at 2:14 AM. The Decludeproc service shut down on its own around 3:45 AM. The server didn't reboot, and the Imail services didn't restart for any reason until I rebooted it to swap out the decludeproc.exe later in the day. Looking in my inbox this morning, the problem doesn't seem to have reoccurred since yesterday afternoon.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists) Also, Dan, are you running Hijack?
John T eServices For You
|
