I'm feeling the love. Andrew 8)
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:34 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with imail8.21??? > > Scott, > > We are very happy with the suggestions Declude users have > made regarding tests and improvements of Declude, as soon as > we are done with the Declude 3.0 release the focus will be on > these additions wrt to functionality. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:20 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with imail8.21??? > > Yeah, throw us Pro users a couple of bones! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <Declude.JunkMail@declude.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:02 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with imail8.21??? > > > DB> 1. 3.0.3 in our testing has been considerably quicker than that of > earlier versions of Declude. > > Dave, at the top of my suggested list for "new code" in > declude.exe has been to do robust MIME decoding so that > Declude PRO text filters no longer grind the raw layer of > attachments for spammy text. That alone would make Declude > orders of magnitude faster, more accurate, and lighter on RAM. > > Meanwhile, Matt's SizeOf.vbs and Scott's compiled version > have been a great stopgap for me. If anybody out there is > wondering what the heck I'm talking about, check the archive > for my posting of my SKIPATTACH test. > > Andrew 8) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:54 AM > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with > > imail8.21??? > > > > Dan, > > > > 1. 3.0.3 in our testing has been considerably quicker than that of > > earlier versions of Declude. > > > > 2. We have never seen an long delay in the processing of > email and no > > one else has reported this. > > > > 3. As mentioned on the Beta page there are still issues with orphan > > files due to Hijack, but this is because the hijack is moving the > > email to the HOLD2 folder and leaving files behind, these > email should > > not be legitimate. > > > > 4. The only other reasons we are aware of for orphan files is > > - if the files already exist in the location (eg Spam > folder) then the > > files cannot be moved from the \work directory to that location. > > > > 5. In order to find the cause please send us your log files > / copy of > > an orphaned email / config files for us to look at the situation ? > > > > 6. In addition to the lists, in future it would be a good idea to > > email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with issues you are experiencing so we > > can deal with them promptly. > > > > Thanks > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:26 PM > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with > > imail8.21??? > > > > > > 3.0.3. Mail has backed up repeatedly since installing this > version. > > We originally installed 3.0 when it was released, but > quickly backed > > off that when the service stopped on its own, leaving > multiple files > > in the proc directory. After waiting a while, we got an email about > > 3.0.3 being released which seemed to specifically target > the problems > > we had, so we again immediately installed that version (on Sep 2). > > The results were OK until the weekend when mail piled up for an > > unknown reason. We just waited that one out, and the next > one which > > occurred Monday afternoon. The one from yesterday though caused an > > hour-long delay in email delivery. Today the decision was made to > > cease the beta test and revert back to 1.82. The change > was made this > > morning at around 9:00 AM EST, and the files I noted are > still in the > > work directory now, 5 hours later. > > > > I just want to note that the same server never backs up > running 1.82. > > I notice that there is now a version 3.0.3.4, but we of > course haven't > > tried that version. FWIW, we are using all three Declude products > > including Hijack. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:04 PM > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with > > imail8.21??? > > > > > > Dan, > > > > What version for Declude Beta were you running? As we have not seen > > the behavior you are referring to. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:58 PM > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with > > imail8.21??? > > > > > > Yes, we just today reverted back to 1.82 because our > single-processor > > machine backed up. At the worst there was an hour delay in > delivery. > > I specifically denoted it was a single-processor machine just to > > indicate that our problems would not be related to the > multi-processor > > sleep problems. > > It just doesn't seem able to handle the load that 1.82 does. > > And yes, we have increased our THREADS to 25. > > > > Also, they claim to have fixed a problem with leftover files, but > > after swapping out the Declude executable with 1.82 and leaving the > > Decludeproc service running, 24 files are still stranded in the > > "spool\proc\work" > > directory and there are 9 *.vir directories still in there > (they are > > truly stranded, even the 24 files comprise 12 paired q and d files > > they are not being delivered for several hours with the Decludeproc > > service still running. I am going to have to move them > back into the > > spool directory manually). > > The Decludeproc service has NOT stopped running at all in > the several > > days it has been running, so I don't know why the files are > stranded. > > I just tried restarting it to see if I could "wake it up", but it > > didn't give me any love. Looking at the dates, I see one q/d pair > > from Sep 2, several from Sep > > 7 and the 2 pair from today. Each one of these represents a "lost" > > email. I opened a few and didn't find any of them to be spam. The > > one thing I can't abide is "lost" email, so I had to stop our beta > > test. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:11 PM > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there any hope running > Declude with > > imail8.21??? > > > > > > IMail 8.20+ is only compatible with Declude 3+, but that > software is > > still in early beta and I wouldn't recommend it. > > This combination can work, but it appears that the higher > the volume > > you have, the more likely you are to experience serious issues with > > E-mail backing up. I have been using IMail > > 8.15 HF2 for many months without any new issues, and it works very > > well with Declude 2.0.6.16 (the most recent interim > > release) which also doesn't have any new issues. The newer Declude > > 3.0 that is in beta is basically the same in terms of > functionality, > > but it is changed to act as a service in order to resolve > issues with > > the changes in IMail 8.20+ and also increase performance slightly. > > This is a big change for Declude, and building a service to handle > > E-mail reliably isn't a small feat so I would suggest being > patient in > > the mean time. > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > Timothy Bohen wrote: > > > > Oh ouch, thats embarrising, you could have sent this off > list!!! :) I > > KNOW I didnt change that path, is there any chance > upgrading to 8.21 > > somehow changed it? > > > > So anyway, now that I downgraded already, should I go to > 8.21 again or > > are there problems with declude? I'm not crazy about running a beta > > version of declude. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > > From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:28:41 -0400 > > > > > > > > I gave up and downgraded to 8.15 now > > I'm getting: > > 09:07 15:08 SMTPD(CP) error 3 executing "c:\imail\Declude.exe" > > > > > > "D:\IMAIL\spool\Q3ab90041008c0e76.SMD" > > > > It looks like you set up Declude to run in > > C:\IMail, but you run IMail > > on D:\IMail. :) > > -Scott > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail > > mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The > > archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ > > Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
