Do you have a hijack.cfg file in your Declude folder by chance? John T eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!" > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:20 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emails not be scanned by Declude > > Hi, > > Not using Hijack. Imail 8.05 with latest Declude suite last week. > Downgraded to 4.0.9 and didn't see this issue. > > Kevin > > At 02:22 PM 4/25/2006, you wrote: > >To those that are reporting this issue, are you running Hijack? > > > >John T > >eServices For You > > > >"Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:09 PM > > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emails not be scanned by Declude > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are seeing this on our system too. Some emails are not being > > > processed by Declude. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > At 08:53 AM 4/25/2006, you wrote: > > > >I'm also interested in this problem. I have left our system on IMail 8.15 > > > >and Declude 1.82 because of this. It doesn't seem to happen on this > >version. > > > >I would really like to find a workaround so I can upgrade. > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden > > > >Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:54 AM > > > >To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > > > >Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Emails not be scanned by Declude > > > > > > > >These types have become an increasing menace to our system also. It does > > > >fail some of our Declude tests but it does not get scanned by Spamchk > > > >which would have put them over the hold limit. > > > >Has anyone come up with an alternative test for this? We've just > > > >recently switched over to the Pro version of Declude so I'm not familiar > > > >with filters yet. > > > > > > > >On a side note, we subject tag all messages over the hold level with > > > >their spam score. When using Spam Review, there are a bunch of messages > > > >that were held but the subject is listed as one of the header fields. > > > >Usually the ones that are from Yahoo or Hotmail and have > > > >"To:MIME-Version..." or "To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version..." in the Spam > > > >Review Subject column are legitimate message (false positives) while the > > > >ones that have "X-complaints-To::Content-Transfer-Encoding;" are all > >spam. > > > >All other Spam Review columns are correct. Anyone have a test/remedy for > > > >this? > > > > > > > >John Olden > > > >Systems Administrator > > > >Champaign Park District > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Michael Thomas - Mathbox wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > You might want to look at the entire typical file, in Notepad or Dump > >it > > > > > contents as hex values. I have noticed a similar percentage of spam > >that > > > >has > > > > > no carriage returns. Which means that the Declude headers get added to > >the > > > > > end of the file, rather than after the headers. If you also happen to > >run > > > > > invURIBL, you will note that the currently available version does not > > > >parse > > > > > the message, apparently because at most there is only one "line" in > >the > > > > > message. Don't know if this is your issue, but thought I would point > >it > > > >out > > > > > as a possiblity. If that is the case, it was fairly simple to write a > >test > > > > > for it. > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--- > > > >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > >--- > > > >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > > >__________ NOD32 1.1507 (20060425) Information __________ > > > > > > > >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > > >http://www.eset.com > > > > > > --- > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > >--- > >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > >__________ NOD32 1.1507 (20060425) Information __________ > > > >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > >http://www.eset.com > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
