|
Matt,
Just a minor point, it doesn't affect your
logic.
>Now according to Michael's tests, the
CR-only pattern leads to parsing issues in Declude Virus where it can't even
find the attachment to scan it.
Actually, it was the "No Cr" (I.E. LF only) test that passed
completely undetected.
By the
way, I agree with you. As I pointed out in my original message, there are
several web sites that send legitimate response messages (an Airline comes to
mind readily) that fail the test. They are not entirely broken, but some lines
are missing the Cr. I think it depends on what section of code they happen to be
running through. It is a typical issue of Linux/Unix '\n' programming
habit.
Michael Thomas --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. |
- Re: [Possible Spam][Declude.JunkMail] On RFC Viol... David Sullivan
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Possible Spam][Declude.J... Michael Thomas - Mathbox
- Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Possible Spam][Declu... Matt
- [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violat... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RF... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: ... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ... Matt
- RE: SPAM-WARN:Re: [... Michael Thomas - Mathbox
- RE: [Declude.JunkMa... Andy Schmidt
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude... Michael Thomas - Mathbox
- Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Dec... Darin Cox
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... David Barker
- Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... Darin Cox
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... David Barker
- Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... Darin Cox
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... David Barker
- Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... Darin Cox
- RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: ... David Barker
