This is an ADD rather than a FIX and is on the Add list. David
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List David, You also need to add a new whitelist tag (whitelistunique?) that only whitelists the "TO" recipient if it's the only recipient for the email. This bit about whitelisting all recipients if one is whitelisted is a problem. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List > > With reference to X-Declude-RefID: it is part of the *Zerohour test doesn't > operate as other tests issue. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Andy Schmidt > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List > > Hi, > > Thanks for posting! Openness is a great confidence builder! Seeing > that problems are at least being recognized goes a long way to giving > me some small flicker of hope that things at Declude might turn around yet. > > Now your corporate management has to prove themselves by demonstrating that > they are finally serious about fulfilling the service contracts we purchased > by not allowing crucial problems to remain open for yet another year. > They cannot keep holding out their hands each year, if the money is > not spent on > the intended purpose. Fixing the Auto-Whitelist with a simple MDAC SQL query > against the Imail 2006 Workgroupshare database is no rocket science. > It might take a day - but not a year. > > PS: > This is a minor issue and probably doesn't deserve to be on your list > - but > I never got a reply on how to suppress the empty and unwanted > > X-Declude-RefID: > > header. > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax: +1 201 934-9206 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:36 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are > currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds > for new > functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not > on this list. > > *Line Terminator Problem > > *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 > > *Reported Memory Leaks & Decludeproc crash on zero pointers > > *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests > > *Zip vulnerability > > *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) > > *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an > executable > > *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice > generated emails > > *Attached web pages seen as .com files > > *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking > > *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 > > *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters > > *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels > > *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases > > David Barker > Director of Product Development > Your Email security is our business > 978.499.2933 office > 978.988.1311 fax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM > Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > > I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. > Just give > me some time (days) and I will get it posted. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. > > Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I > realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume > significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable > of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and > upgrade to > 4.x. > > Thanks again, > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM > Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > > Darin, > > Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message > to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line > terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I > do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving > around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. > > David Barker > Director of Product Development > Your Email security is our business > 978.499.2933 office > 978.988.1311 fax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What > progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM > Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned > > > Hi All, > > I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. > I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was > Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. > > Michael Thomas > Mathbox > 978-683-6718 > 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
