Hi Herb,
I agree wholeheartedly, and have posted
on keeping a current issues list on their site several times in the
past. However, David Barker did just kindly post a list of known
issues they are working on. We're waiting on him to tell us when they are
scheduling release of fixes to these problems. In case you missed it, the
list David posted is
*Line Terminator Problem
*Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks & Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases Darin. ----- Original Message -----
From: Herb Guenther
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mods by
Declude Thanks for the links, and yes, I did just join this list this week. Kind of discouraging actually to see that this has been a known issue for a long time and has not been solved. I had not even thought of the issue re sneaking thru a virus as well. With all of the exchanges I did not actually see an official statement as to when this will be fixed other than that it has perhaps been moved up in priority. I understand that supplying products like declude and sniffer, etc. is not a barrel of laughs as it is a battle. But as a customer I sure want the troops to be protecting my customers. I wonder if a document on issues that are known and being worked on, with a priority and eta that would be under the customer logged in area would help. That way Declude would not have to keep answering some of the same questions over and over again. I know that disclosure can be painful, but at the end of the day it does just reflect reality, the only difference is customers know what is happening instead of guessing. Take care, Herb John T (Lists) wrote: Hello Herb and welcome to the Declude JunkMail list. This is a known issue with spam that has "improper" coding in the header and has been discussed at length. Here are some links to the existing discussions: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg30444.html http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg30003.html http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg29909.html In a nut shell, Declude (and fpReview) are expecting certain code (that must be there accourding to RFC) to tell where the headers start and end and so forth but some of that code is missing. Declude is well aware of the problem and David Barker has stated that he is raising the priority of getting this fixed. John T eServices For You "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." Ralph Waldo Emerson-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herb Guenther Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:02 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mods by Declude Hi All; We have been having a problem with Declude not modifying the true subject and header on many spam messages. Sniffer and a number of the other tests catch the message, but Declude is adding a header stub to the bottom of the message source, and not the real header. Since we have our system set up to pre-pend "Probable SPAM:" to the subject line all of these messages go right thru the email clients filters. We are running the latest version of Declude, 4.3.14 with Smartermail. I have submitted several samples and let the folks know at Declude, but have not had any feedback. When mentioning it on the message sniffer mail list others are also experiencing this as well. Have other Declude customers seen this and what information does Declude need to work on this problem? Thanks, Herb -- Herb Guenther Lanex, LLC www.lanex.com (262)789-0966x102 Office (262)780-0424 Direct This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intendedrecipient(s)only. If youare not an intended recipient please advise us of our error by returne-mail thendelete this e-mail and any attached files. You may not copy, disclose oruse thecontents in any way. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- Herb Guenther Lanex, LLC www.lanex.com (262)789-0966x102 Office (262)780-0424 Direct This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files. You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. |
- [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mods by Declude Herb Guenther
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mods b... John T \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mo... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] bad heade... John T \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mods b... John T \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bad header mo... Herb Guenther
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bad heade... Darin Cox