strange since I had the interim versions, many of them. I do not remember seeing this vulnerability especially being spoofed.
I wonder though: I added a vulnerability.eml and have ONLYSENDIFVIRUSNAMEHAS JPEG Vulnerability I assumed that the virusname would have to have JPEG Vulnerability, both words, is this the case? On Friday, October 1, 2004 8:55 AM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Since upgrading to 1.80 I am seeing many more Invalid CPL Vulnerabilities. >>Is this just timing or is there something different for these vulnerabilities? >> >>The interesting thing about these is that they are coming from spoofed >>senders multiple deliveries at a time. > >The Invalid CPL Vulnerability detection was added to v1.80 (it was in >1.79iXX interims as well). I do not believe any changes were made from >when it was first implemented. > > -Scott >--- >Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers >since 2000. >Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver >vulnerability detection. >Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day >evaluation. > >--- >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus >(http://www.declude.com)] > >--- >This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and >type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
