On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Caron, Maxime wrote: > I tried to create a JIRA first but could not figure out to create one. > Anyway I was pretty sure it was just not using the API correctly. > And it ended-up being the case now it work perfectly on Linux but I still > have some issue on Solaris and windows.
Even when you instantiate a new http client for each request? > > I agree that it should throw an exception which is more specific to deft > instead of just doing a null pointer exception. I was also thinking about > introducing another class which create an new instance of > AsynchronousHttpClient for each request so you don’t need to do it yourself > and so it can be optimized by the framework latter on. > > Thanks a lot to everybody this project seem really alive hope it will > continue to be. Thanks. > > Regard > Maxime Caron > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 5:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: I think i found a bug in the latest version 0.4.0 > > On 11/8/11 8:04 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: >> Hi Caron, >> >> You should create a new AsynchronousHttpClient for each new request (The >> async http client can't handle concurrent request atm). >> So above client.fetch(..) you should add >> >> AsynchronousHttpClient client = new AsynchronousHttpClient(); >> >> >> HTH >> Roger Schildmeijer >> >> Ps. Don't hesitate to contact us again if experience other problems. irc >> (#deft, freenode) or here on the mailing list. Ds. > > JIRA... This is where such errors should be logged. Don't hesitate to > ask the user to flll one, even if it's invalid : many other users ay > check the JIRA before asking on the ML, and taht would spare you a lot > of time. > > And a NPE should not be considered as a user error : it deserves a > correct error message in the framework, IMO. > > My 2 cts... > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions > or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, > advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform > and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in > error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender > immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or > privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under > applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject > to terms available at the following link: > http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, > please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By > messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.
