> but wouldn´t it be better to put this content > on Wiki, and sure you can track such changes/additions > through JIRA.
You're right, but I'm never too sure whether Confluence is in or out... but yes, that would be a much better place for it of course. On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 19:10 +0100, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi... > > 1st of all apologies for not being around that last few months. > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Johnathan Meehan <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I know there's a thread to discuss, erm, threads, but I thought a fresh > > place to discuss the architectural-level changes we might want to make > > would be a good idea. I created DEFT-120 as a place for anybody to > > attach diagrams and the like for reference in this discussion, and I was > > thinking the initial intention could be as limited as bringing some > > order to the current code base. > > > Thats pretty good on the idea perspective, but wouldn´t it be better to put > this content on Wiki, and sure you can track such changes/additions through > JIRA. > > IMHO JIRA should be a place for documentation it is more about change > management and tracking. > > But this is only an opinion :) > > > > > > > > For my own part, I do have a couple of ideas I intend to document but > > right now I will look at implementing Acceptor-Connector as a first > > step. > > > > Cheers, > > Johnathan > > > > > >
