Your message dated Mon, 1 Jan 2001 00:25:36 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#80937: apt-get doesn't calculate ETA per-server
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2000 05:51:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 30 23:51:40 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (kabuki.eyep.net) [203.36.158.121] (qmailr)
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14CbP9-0001ym-00; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:51:40 -0600
Received: (qmail 6243 invoked by uid 0); 31 Dec 2000 05:54:52 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO kabuki.eyep.net) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by localhost with SMTP; 31 Dec 2000 05:54:52 -0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt-get doesn't calculate ETA per-server
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:54:50 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: apt
Version: 0.3.19
Severity: wishlist

When apt-get calculates its ETA when downloading something, if it is
downloading from multiple servers, it doesn't do it per server:
example:
downloading 1k from server 1 at 99999999k/sec
downloading 9999999k from server 2 at 1k/sec
instead of saying:
server 1 will be .000000000001 of a second
and server 2 will be 9999999 seconds
to make 999999999.00000000000001 seconds
it says:
it will be (combined download speed / total downloads) seconds

So, would it be possible to make apt-get calculate ETAs per-server, then add
them all up?
:) d

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80937-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2001 07:25:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 01 01:25:52 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (ike-ext.ab.videon.ca) [206.75.216.35] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14CzLs-00030r-00; Mon, 01 Jan 2001 01:25:52 -0600
Received: (qmail 14898 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2001 07:25:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) 
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
          by ike-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 1 Jan 2001 07:25:41 -0000
Received: from localhost
        ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
        by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14CzLg-0008Mk-00; Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:25:40 -0700
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 00:25:36 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#80937: apt-get doesn't calculate ETA per-server
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Daniel Stone wrote:

> When apt-get calculates its ETA when downloading something, if it is
> downloading from multiple servers, it doesn't do it per server:

Yes, but that is probably best. Think about a modem where the bandwidth is
limited by the incoming pipe, so bandwidth per source is quite wrong, only
on broadband does it make any difference, and even then not much.

It is an estimate, accept that it always wrong for some of the time.

Jason

Reply via email to